NATO to reduce joint Afghan operations | ||
Move comes as number of international troops killed by Afghans in the uniforms of police and army this year reaches 51.
Last Modified: 17 Sep 2012 21:53
| ||
The directive to scale back partnership with Afghan forces was issued on Sunday [GALLO/GETTY]
| ||
NATO has said it has scaled back operations with members of the Afghan National Security Forces in an attempt to lower the risk of so-called insider attacks. A total of 51 international troops have been killed by Afghans in the uniforms of the nation's police and military forces so far this year. Until recently, elements of NATO NATO said such operations are no longer routine and require the approval of the regional commander.
Jordan said the re-assessment of the pairing is meant to "reduce the opportunity for these [foreign] troops to be injured or killed" while serving with their Afghan counterparts. The directive to scale back partnership with Afghan forces was issued by Lieutenant General James Terry on Sunday. The latest "insider attack" occurred on Sunday when several Afghan men in police uniform killed four US soldiers and wounded two others at a checkpoint in the Mizan district of Zabul province. The Zabul attack was preceded by an attack on a military base in Helmand province on Friday. The attack at Camp Bastion, which the Taliban has claimed responsibility for, left two US soldiers dead and destroyed six attack jets. Though Camp Bastion is considered one of the largest and best-defended posts in Afghanistan, the attack was the single most destructive strike on Western armaments in the 11-year-long war. Is afghanistan ready for us to leave now? any thoughts- jacob k |
Mr. Bailey's 2nd Block IR-GSI Class blog focused on the current events of South and Central Asia
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
NATO to reduce joint Afghan operations
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Personally, I think we need to bring our Army and our Marines HOME, and as soon as possible. Believe me; we are accomplishing NOTHING in Afghanistan. With all due respect, we're merely enriching the people who manufacture body bags and coffins. Other than that…it’s nothing new. We went to Afghanistan to remove the Taliban government, which aided and abetted the 911 Terrorists. We accomplished that and a new Afghan government was formed and has been in place for several years. I think that separating the missions of the Afghan military from the U.S. Army will help reduce the threat of insider attacks, but the best way to protect our troops is to get them out of this hostile region. The Russians were entrenched in Afghanistan for 20 years—much like our situation in Vietnam. We have been in Afghanistan now for 11 years. We need to show people of other nations how to gain freedom from evil governments rather than fight their battles for them.
ReplyDelete-Catherine D.
I agree, we have been in there too long and need to pull out there is no sence in wasting troops lives.
ReplyDelete-Jacob D
I agree that the lives that are being lost are seemingly for no reason however, they're obviously not stable and the Taliban have a hold on the government. It is obvious and I have to bring up the question, if we pull out could we have another 9-11 fiasco? Can we, with clear minds right now, honestly put ourselves in that place again? We know they're there and still out to get us; I think it would almost be more dangerous for us to completely pull out now then earlier.
ReplyDeleteJordan S.